I'have no test case, but I can search the file and prepare a test.
El lun, 05-05-2008 a las 21:43 -0700, Julio Castillo escribió:
> Paco,
> If you have a test case available on the issue you found with POI 3.0.2 I'd
> be more than happy to pursue that with the POI folks.
> Again, I am interested in making sure that using newer versions of the other
> libraries work fine in my jackrabbit's environment.
>
> ** julio
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paco Avila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Other 3rd party libraries in Jackrabbit's war file
>
> Yes, ?pdfbox 0.7.3 is much better than the default Jackrabbit version. I
> have been testing POI 3.0.2 and failed to extract text from some Excel files
> which was done whithout problems with POI 3.0.1.
>
> El jue, 01-05-2008 a las 14:39 -0700, Julio Castillo escribió:
> > Thought I share this with you all and save you some time.
> >
> > Because we use a good number of open source libraries, I had to test
> > Jackrabbit (to the degree that I use it) with newer versions of other
> > libraries that are embedded in the jackrabbit war file.
> >
> > I successfully deployed and ran with the following upgrades.
> >
> > - slf4j 1.5.0
> > - commons-codec 1.3
> > - commons-collections 3.2
> > - commons-httpclient 3.1
> > - junit 4.4
> > - log4j 1.2.15
> > - xerces 2.9.1
> > - pdfbox 0.7.3 that should include new dependency on fontbox 0.1 (See
> > bug#
> > 1567)
> > - POI 3.0.2
> >
> > Couldn't upgrade the tm-extractors (see bug# 1568)
> >
> > Julio Castillo
> > Edgenuity Inc.
> >
> --
> Paco Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GIT Consultors
>
--
Paco Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GIT Consultors
