Fabain : Runtime every generic will be an Object and ONLY of type 
java.lang.Object.  It is not a problem with jackrabbit-ocm but a result of the 
way generics is implemented in Java.  However you will be able to map out the 
object exactly the say you want to map it our by using the right converter 
(Bean Converter or Collection Converter) available with jackrabbit-ocm.  If 
none is fitting your requirements writing one is very simple too.  Why don't 
you lay out your exact requirements I will be able to help you with it.  I am 
in the thick of a jackrabbit-ocm based persistent storage implementation and I 
am effextively using a generic dao (AbstractDao<T>) just like the one JCROM 
has.  There is absolutely any doubt that jackrabbit-ocm is superior to any JCR 
OR mapping tools available currently.

Thanks
boni

-----Original Message-----
From: Fard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 10 November 2008 21:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: an alternative OCM (Object Content Mapping)


Hello Fabián,

Your example is a good example. It is exactly one of my problems.
the other things in JACROM I could not define a filed with java.lang.Object
type in my class. Beacause I would like to assign an object/s of any type
(for example String, File,...) during run time to it. 
I have also used native Jackrabbit OCM and I couldn't solve my problem with
it.
So I'm looking for anather OCM for transaction with Jackrabbit.

Regards

Fard
 

Fabián Mandelbaum wrote:
> 
> Fard escribió:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I am looking for an alternative OCM (Object Content Mapping). I have used
>> JCROM and I found it is useful, but recently I found it is not a good
>> remedy
>> for java generic programming.
>>
>> I really really appreciate any help.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fard
>>   
> Hello Fard,
> 
>     what do you mean with "Java Generic Programming"? Things like:
> 
>     public class SomeDAO<T>
> 
>     for example?
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/an-alternative-OCM-%28Object-Content-Mapping%29-tp20414717p20422419.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to