Hello Boni,
even this answer wasn't directed to me, please let me answer to it.
I believe that the best/superior/whatever tool is the one that does
the job the way you want it.
OCM is the most complete, official, sofisticated,
add_more_adjectives_here, JCR OR mapping solution, but JCROM looks far
simpler and is based on annotations, which is a great thing for people
coming from other OR mapping solutions (like Hibernate) because it makes
things more "familiar", which is always a big plus for development.
Boni Gopalan (BioImagene) escribió:
> Fabain : Runtime every generic will be an Object and ONLY of type
> java.lang.Object. It is not a problem with jackrabbit-ocm but a result of
> the way generics is implemented in Java. However you will be able to map out
> the object exactly the say you want to map it our by using the right
> converter (Bean Converter or Collection Converter) available with
> jackrabbit-ocm. If none is fitting your requirements writing one is very
> simple too. Why don't you lay out your exact requirements I will be able to
> help you with it. I am in the thick of a jackrabbit-ocm based persistent
> storage implementation and I am effextively using a generic dao
> (AbstractDao<T>) just like the one JCROM has. There is absolutely any doubt
> that jackrabbit-ocm is superior to any JCR OR mapping tools available
> currently.
>
> Thanks
> boni
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 November 2008 21:18
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: an alternative OCM (Object Content Mapping)
>
>
> Hello Fabián,
>
> Your example is a good example. It is exactly one of my problems.
> the other things in JACROM I could not define a filed with java.lang.Object
> type in my class. Beacause I would like to assign an object/s of any type
> (for example String, File,...) during run time to it.
> I have also used native Jackrabbit OCM and I couldn't solve my problem with
> it.
> So I'm looking for anather OCM for transaction with Jackrabbit.
>
> Regards
>
> Fard
>
>
> Fabián Mandelbaum wrote:
>
>> Fard escribió:
>>
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I am looking for an alternative OCM (Object Content Mapping). I have used
>>> JCROM and I found it is useful, but recently I found it is not a good
>>> remedy
>>> for java generic programming.
>>>
>>> I really really appreciate any help.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fard
>>>
>>>
>> Hello Fard,
>>
>> what do you mean with "Java Generic Programming"? Things like:
>>
>> public class SomeDAO<T>
>>
>> for example?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
