Hi, On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:50, majohnst <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jackrabbit 1.6 uses Lucene 2.4.1. I think 1.5 uses Lucene 2.4.0. In > Jackrabbit 1.6, some things were refactored to work better with 2.4.1.
jackrabbit 1.5 depends on lucene 2.3.2. > The SortedLuceneQueryHits is new in 1.6, so I cannot tell if the performance > drop is caused by this new Jackrabbit code or by some code changes in Lucene > 2.4.1. can you please file a jira issue with your observations and describe in more detail how your content structure looks like (number of nodes, distinct date values, other property values that you used in your query)? thanks regards marcel
