I've created an issue in JIRA for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2353
Marcel Reutegger wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:50, majohnst <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Jackrabbit 1.6 uses Lucene 2.4.1. I think 1.5 uses Lucene 2.4.0. In >> Jackrabbit 1.6, some things were refactored to work better with 2.4.1. > > jackrabbit 1.5 depends on lucene 2.3.2. > >> The SortedLuceneQueryHits is new in 1.6, so I cannot tell if the >> performance >> drop is caused by this new Jackrabbit code or by some code changes in >> Lucene >> 2.4.1. > > can you please file a jira issue with your observations and describe > in more detail how your content structure looks like (number of nodes, > distinct date values, other property values that you used in your > query)? > > thanks > > regards > marcel > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Date-Property-Performance-in-1.6-tp25704607p25856478.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
