I'm reading the PersistenceManager FAQ [1]. There's a part where it discusses "What combination of FS and PM is the best choice?" In reading through this section I have a couple of questions:
1) I read elsewhere that the FS is only used for some administrative stuff, like the search index and configuration. Is this correct? In other words, the FS isn't a part of the storage for the actual repo content, that's all done by the PM? 2) It appears as if there is no good file system backed PM . . . is this accurate? The bundleFsPM is described as non-production, read only. So, this kind of means that the FS is NOT a choice for backing the content of my repo, correct? 3) Is the Derby PM considered production worthy? Any reason not to use it? http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ
