BTW, I'm using 2.0-beta3.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, ChadDavis <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm reading the PersistenceManager FAQ [1]. There's a part where it > discusses "What combination of FS and PM is the best choice?" In > reading through this section I have a couple of questions: > > 1) I read elsewhere that the FS is only used for some administrative > stuff, like the search index and configuration. Is this correct? In > other words, the FS isn't a part of the storage for the actual repo > content, that's all done by the PM? > > 2) It appears as if there is no good file system backed PM . . . is > this accurate? The bundleFsPM is described as non-production, read > only. So, this kind of means that the FS is NOT a choice for backing > the content of my repo, correct? > > 3) Is the Derby PM considered production worthy? Any reason not to use it? > > > http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ >
