maikhorma wrote: > > It seems more natural to me that I could pass a node object, even if all > that does is node.getPath() (which is what JR's implementation does). >
Correction, that is not what JR does, that was actually a separate thought. I meant to say that all JR's implementation does is call session.getNode(path), and I imagine most implementations would do the same thing. -- View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Versioning-How-to-cancel-checkout-tp3801494p3802432.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
