On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: >> But more generally I wonder if there are any plans to improve this situation. > > Not that I know of, unfortunately. > > AFAICT most people using Jackrabbit do so in embedded mode, either > directly or through Sling, and thus there hasn't been much interest in > (or contributions to) the standalone server or other non-embedded > deployment scenarios. An since most of the embedded deployment > scenarios are highly dependent on the host application, the scope for > shared documentation has been rather narrow. Yeah, but even then lots of things remain the same regardless of the "host app and regardless if its embedded or not. This applies to configuration but even more so to such stuff as SQL2 syntax etc. > Of course there's no reason why that should be the case also in the > future, and I'd be eager to support any good proposals for improving > the level of shared documentation. maybe HippoCMS and Magnolia people can chime in here? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith [email protected]
