hi,

i think the question lukas is asking goes further than just the concrete
example of running it stand-alone. if you want to use the API, for
example to write a SQL2 query or build a content type definition with
the jcr type manager you are pretty much on your own. you can try to
read the spec, but a spec is not the ideal thing to learn how to do
common use cases.

i think the questions are:

* can we make hyppo, magnolia and others contribute documentation on
core jcr features that they have in their projects?
* what would be the right format and place to put the documentation? i
agree with lukas that the wiki is not ideal. it does not give the
information enough structure if you want to learn things. a good example
imho is the symfony documentation [1]
* who would help to assemble a useful documentation and write missing
parts? the wiki contains some really outdated information and would need
to be cleaned up.


cheers,david

[1] http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/index.html

Am 19.09.2012 11:36, schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:
> 
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> But more generally I wonder if there are any plans to improve this 
>>> situation.
>>
>> Not that I know of, unfortunately.
>>
>> AFAICT most people using Jackrabbit do so in embedded mode, either
>> directly or through Sling, and thus there hasn't been much interest in
>> (or contributions to) the standalone server or other non-embedded
>> deployment scenarios. An since most of the embedded deployment
>> scenarios are highly dependent on the host application, the scope for
>> shared documentation has been rather narrow.
> 
> Yeah, but even then lots of things remain the same regardless of the "host 
> app and regardless if its embedded or not. This applies to configuration but 
> even more so to such stuff as SQL2 syntax etc.
> 
>> Of course there's no reason why that should be the case also in the
>> future, and I'd be eager to support any good proposals for improving
>> the level of shared documentation.
> 
> 
> maybe HippoCMS and Magnolia people can chime in here?
> 
> regards,
> Lukas Kahwe Smith
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Liip AG // Agile Web Development // T +41 26 422 25 11
CH-1700 Fribourg // PGP 0xA581808B // www.liip.ch

Reply via email to