Hi Andy, On 30.05.2012 14:13, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 30/05/12 08:36, "Dr. André Lanka" wrote: >> Another crucial point is the possibility to sparql the >> original(=unmodified) data during a write transaction (from the same >> thread). > > If you have two datasets t the same lcoation, one read on the original > data, and one write, that will work. It's lock-free mechanism until > commit flushing.
That's great :-) So, the global cache is left. We'll investigate this (and implement if applicable) as soon as we have a larger time block for this. Thanks again for your help André
