Thanks, I didn't realize XMLLiterals have to be canonical.

You don't mean XMLLiterals are going away, do you?
Escaped XML would cut off all XML processing tools (I heavily use XSLT
on RDF/XML, for example).

Martynas

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Damian Steer <d.st...@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 25/06/12 13:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> The best RDF-WG is going to do is make XMLLiteral less mandatory.
>
> 'Less mandatory'? :-)
>
> I was writing a similar reply as this came in. It's horrible trying to
> explain it, and it will be nice not to have to do that post-rdf 1.1.
>
> Damian
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk/oXQIACgkQAyLCB+mTtymq8wCfW3+7CMm6uHdJhHJ+hbqbWrE3
> V/oAoOlmJJfrM1k3brwi1p+j+fswdQrf
> =x69P
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to