On 25/06/12 13:43, Damian Steer wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/12 13:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The best RDF-WG is going to do is make XMLLiteral less mandatory.
'Less mandatory'? :-)
I was writing a similar reply as this came in. It's horrible trying to
explain it, and it will be nice not to have to do that post-rdf 1.1.
I just rant about rdf:XMLLiterals a lot.
The definition isn't changing as far as I can remember. The lexical
space is still c14n exclusive canonicalization with comments, with empty
inclusiveNamespaces. I only know where to look because of helping
people with their data. Never used the things myself.
There are so few real use cases - real XML data can't be put straight
into RDF because of the canonicalization rules. e.g. People having
problem with GML and RDF. Canonicalization software often isn't
available at the point of data creation.
I'll have another coffee now.
Andy
Damian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk/oXQIACgkQAyLCB+mTtymq8wCfW3+7CMm6uHdJhHJ+hbqbWrE3
V/oAoOlmJJfrM1k3brwi1p+j+fswdQrf
=x69P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
