On 26/09/12 01:06, Frank Lee wrote:
Thanks for that, Andy.
So, we can't use any existing API (for we've already grabbed the handle of the
namedGraph model) to duplicate it, SPARQL/update is the only way to do it.
Mu suggestions were made so as to avoid copying everything onto the
local machine, and copying it back out again. Using COPY, only a copy
within the remote machine is done. Is that what you are trying to do?
Andy
________________________________
From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: Remote named graph
On 25/09/12 00:33, Frank Lee wrote:
Hi, Andy,
What will be better way to duplicate existing named graph remotely?
Or duplicated many with different URIs. Is there any simple API to
use for it? Thanks.
Cheers Frank
SPARQL Update:
something like
COPY <g1> To <g2>
for a one to one copy:
or
INSERT { GRAPH <g> { ?s ?p ?o } }
WHERE { GRAPH ?g { ?s ?p ?o } FILTER ( ?g IN ( <g1>, <g2>, <g3> ) ) }
for many
(untested)
Andy
