Hi Andy,

I am trying to use Dydra (http://dydra.com/). It requires to send Accept
header, otherwise it returns with a full HTML webpage (with Dydra's online
query tool on it). For update commands it is happy with just an Accept: */*
then returns 200 and a simple boolean SPARQL XML result.

Example:
POST http://dydra.com/orkszoft/test01/sparql HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Content-Length: 364
Content-Type: application/sparql-update
Host: dydra.com
Connection: Keep-Alive
User-Agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.2.2 (java 1.5)
Authorization: Basic ***

PREFIX  dc:   <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>
PREFIX  rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX  owl:  <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
PREFIX  xsd:  <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
PREFIX  rdf:  <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>

DELETE DATA {
  <http://dbpedia.org/resource/San_Francisco> rdfs:label "My San Francisco"
.
}

Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: */*
Connection: keep-alive
Status: 200
X-Powered-By: Phusion Passenger (mod_rails/mod_rack) 3.0.9
Cache-Control: no-cache
X-UA-Compatible: IE=Edge,chrome=1
Set-Cookie: _dydra_session=****; path=/; HttpOnly
X-Runtime: 0.849964
Server: nginx/1.0.8 + Phusion Passenger 3.0.9 (mod_rails/mod_rack)
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: *
Content-Length: 123

<?xml version='1.0'?>
<sparql xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#'>
  <head/>
  <boolean>true</boolean>
</sparql>


I'm having trouble to decide whether Dydra has a faulty design (it's not
conform with the protocol recommendation) or Jena has no support for the
optional content negotiation (or both)?
It's for sure that Dydra's method is somewhat weird because for a wrong
SPARQL it returns code 400 - so it seems that the response body holds no
new info.


Gabor Simon




2012/12/5 Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>

> On 03/12/12 12:44, Simon Gábor wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> According to the SPARQL Update protocol recommendation:
>> "The response body of a successful update request is implementation
>> defined. Implementations *may* use HTTP content negotiation to provide
>> both
>>
>> human-readable and machine-processable information about the completed
>> update request."
>>
>> How can i specify accept header in the SPARQL Update request? I cannot
>> find
>> a way in UpdateProcessor (UpdateProcessRemote) or in UpdateRequest.
>>
>
> Simon,
>
> There currently isn't a way to do that and also the .execute() operation
> does not return anything.  Errors appear as exceptions driven from the HTTP
> response code.
>
> What had you in mind?
>
> I don't know of any systems currently that return different entity bodies
> based on conneg.  Are there any?
>
> The reason in the spec for "MAY" is that there is no standard format for a
> reply. RDFa, RDF, JSON [1] (why have an RDF processor when you send a
> string?) all make sense in different scenarios.
>
>         Andy
>
> [1] 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-nottingham-http-problem-**01<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-problem-01>
>

Reply via email to