On 25/07/13 15:43, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Andy,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:24:44PM +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Can we agree on the test case?
I don't get he same numbers as you (data changing?)
but do queries 1 and 3 represent the issue?
No. They are truncated.
My bad - I used "head" to label them.
But do these two queries, when complete, capture the issue? query 2
adds nothing?
Reformatted for email:
==> Q1.rq <==
PREFIX :
<http://www.imagesnippets.com/imgtag/datasets/Michaels_Dataset/>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
SELECT (count(*) AS ?c)
WHERE
{ GRAPH ?g
{ SERVICE <http://www.imagesnippets.com/sparql/datasets>
{ ?d rdfs:subClassOf :aidkjfsdf }
?s ?p ?d
}
There is a "}" missing at the end.
==> Q3.rq <==
PREFIX :
<http://www.imagesnippets.com/imgtag/datasets/Michaels_Dataset/>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
SELECT ?c
WHERE
{ SELECT (count(*) AS ?c)
WHERE
{ GRAPH ?g
{ SERVICE <http://www.imagesnippets.com/sparql/datasets>
{ ?d rdfs:subClassOf :aidkjfsdf }
Andy
And here, "?s ?p ?d } } }" is missing at the end.
My archived mail from Jul 17 contains the untruncated queries:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201307.mbox/browser
There are two messages from you:
This one, with 4 queries:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201307.mbox/%3C20130717190649.GA25207%40netestate.de%3E
and we are taking about queries 1 and 3 ?
If I add the missing stuff and execute those queries against our public endpoint
http://www.imagesnippets.com/sparql/dbpedia, I currently get 1 for Q1 and
38188 for Q3. The result should be 1 for both.
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
It's a bug - rewriting the scopes does not get propagated correctly to
and from the SERVICE when there is a nested scope introduced by the
additional projection.
Andy
