Hello Andy,

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:34:55PM +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> My bad - I used "head" to label them.

Ah.

> But do these two queries, when complete, capture the issue?

Yes

> query 2 adds nothing?

Yes. Q2 and Q4 just demonstrate that "distinct ?g" does not solve the issue
(you suggested distinct ?g in an earlier mail). Sorry if this made things
complicated.

> This one, with 4 queries:
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201307.mbox/%3C20130717190649.GA25207%40netestate.de%3E
> 
> and we are taking about queries 1 and 3 ?

Yes.

> It's a bug - rewriting the scopes does not get propagated correctly to 
> and from the SERVICE when there is a nested scope introduced by the 
> additional projection.

I am very relieved to hear this ;-)

Regards,

Michael Brunnbauer

-- 
++  Michael Brunnbauer
++  netEstate GmbH
++  Geisenhausener Straße 11a
++  81379 München
++  Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
++  Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 
++  E-Mail [email protected]
++  http://www.netestate.de/
++
++  Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
++  USt-IdNr. DE221033342
++  Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
++  Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel

Attachment: pgpduTM1M1TG3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to