Holger
Yes that more common case you've identified would be affected so switching this optimizer off until we've resolved this is the way to go Rob On 8/4/13 6:05 PM, "Holger Knublauch" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 8/3/2013 23:09, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> Please file a JIRA for this and attach the test case. > >Done. > >> >> It would also be good to find out why this case arises when other >> cases when FILTER/unbound evaluation is detected have not arisen. >> Maybe the situations are simply less common. > >I have switched off this optimizer for now so that I can continue >evaluating the new Jena version. The test case that I sent was >(obviously) artificial, just the bare minimum. The surrounding use case >is common though in our code base, e.g.: > >BIND (ex:someFunction(?x) AS ?y) . >FILTER ?prebound = ?y . > >It does not resemble the pattern that the optimizer is trying to >address, which I understand to be > ><a> <b> ?x . ><c> <b> ?y . >FILTER ?x = ?y . > >HTH - and thanks for looking into this. > >Holger >
