Hi,

It depends on the use case, but I would say that my main practices fall in two 
categories:
- building ontologies (more or less large), not really individuals involved (I 
use Protege).
- building/assembling large graphs (which may include ontologies, but these are 
classified first): it's a sparql thing.
I didn't find a use case for classifying individuals yet (not saying they don't 
exist, just they didn't happen to me).

Mixing UML with OWL is something I try to stay away as much as possible: I 
don't see much the utility of it, and it's full of mismatches (you can have 
abstract classes in OO, but what is the equivalent in OWL?). Plus I like to 
have relations as first class entities when modeling.

best,
Andrea



Il giorno 25/set/2013, alle ore 17:30, Andreas Grünwald <[email protected]> ha 
scritto:

> Hello Andrea,
> are you concerned about handling large-scale data-models, or about the
> insertion of individuals?
> 
> We (at the Christian Doppler Laboratory at the Technical University of
> Vienna) are dealing with the problem of visualizing large data models (OWL
> ontologies). There is a tool available (UML2OWL - Fast Transformation
> Tool<https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fprojects%2Fuml2owl%2F&ei=8w1DUsLaEorBhAePpICACA&usg=AFQjCNELQCEN00pg2nOem6-eHJqbhvC8HQ&sig2=reG3DhoATtsy5a_tYdt9GA&bvm=bv.53077864,d.ZG4>)
> which allows users/developers to model data concepts in common UML class
> diagrams, and then transforms the concepts into OWL2. The resulting
> ontology is compatible with the OWLAPI, Protege, and can be loaded into
> Jena.
> 
> Additionally, I am currently working on Model-Driven Approach (replacable
> Java data layer generation for Protege and Jena) , including a Web-based
> model editor. In addition to the (data) model editor, users will be able to
> enter some parts of the ontology (instances) via auto-generated forms.
> 
> Would be interesting for me to hear some of your requirements. Maybe they
> influence/improve our future work.
> 
> Best, Andreas
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Andrea Splendiani <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> to sketch something (especially for end-users) lot of people is using
>> Protege. It gives you an OWL perspective, but you don't need to push it far.
>> It's good to start sketching something.
>> If you go big... then directly handling triples cane be quite useful.
>> 
>> best,
>> Andrea
>> 
>> Il giorno 25/set/2013, alle ore 14:58, Charles Li <[email protected]>
>> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> Hi, Ian:
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much for your reply!
>>> 
>>> We are developing a product catalog application, which keeps descriptions
>>> about product and product relationships attributes. This is an effort to
>>> build from scratch, which means that we will let a group of users to
>>> manually enter product information. I understand eventually we will have
>> to
>>> build a GUI customized to our needs, but is there any general-purpose
>>> RDF/OWL tool that we can quickly leverage to start with. We are still
>> fuzzy
>>> on exactly what kinds of semantic functionality we actually need, but a
>>> tool to help us to manually input RDF triples to a Jena datastore would
>> be
>>> good.
>>> 
>>> Thank you again!
>>> - Charles
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Ian Dickinson <[email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Charles,
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Charles Li <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Not sure if this is the right place for this question, but please allow
>>>> me
>>>>> to try:
>>>> Yes, it's the right place! However ...
>>>> 
>>>>> We have a project that we are going to build the Semantic model from
>>>>> scratch. Eventually we are going to use Apache Jena to query and update
>>>> the
>>>>> model. What tool(s) do you recommend to build the model from scratch?
>>>> I'm not quite sure what you are asking. Can you please say more what
>>>> you intend by "building a model from scratch"? I could take a guess at
>>>> what that means, but it would be easier if you could expand the
>>>> question. Ideally, give an example of what you mean.
>>>> 
>>>> Ian
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Grünwald
> Tel.: +43 650 77 82340

Reply via email to