On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Eric Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> You could try something like this:
>
> select ?a?b?c?d?e
> where
> {
> ?g a :MyKindaGraph.
> graph ?g
>
> {
> ?r rdf:subject <Mr_X>.
> ?r rdf:predicate <isPresident>.
> ?r rdf:object <CountryZ>.
> ?r saidBy ?a.
> ?r saidOn ?b.
> ?r saidAt ?c.
> ?r confidence ?d.
> ?r comment ?e
> }
> }
I think, though I could be wrong, that the point wasn't just to put
the triples _into_ a named graph, but to use a named graph to serve
_as_ the reified triple (or triples). E.g.,
graph ?g { <Mr_X> <isPresident> <CountryZ> }
?g saidBy ?a ; ... ; comment ?e .
This avoids needing three triples for each reified statement, and
makes the queries easier to write. It also makes it easier to provide
meta information about a collection of triples, rather than just a
single reified triple.
//JT
--
Joshua Taylor, http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~tayloj/
