John,
It's helpful if you could describe the specific features that didn't
look complete and what you are looking for for your project.
Monty Widenius (of MariaDB fame and a certain other database) put it
succinctly: there are 3 ways to interact with an open source project:
contribute; sponsor; hope.
Laurens Rietveld contriuted integration on the query tab with his YASGUI
javscript user interface for SPARQL endpoints.
Fuseki2 is currently at least as capable as Fuseki1, which didn't have
any admin. It's the UI that's most new about Fuseki2. For production
use Fuseki1, had no UI. Fusek1 is deployed as a OS service (or some
custom setup).
Fuseki2 can run that way - it is compatible with Fuseki1 configuration.
It can also run from a WAR file dropped into a webapp conatiner such
as Tomcat. The execution of SPARQL protocols is the same as Fuseki1,
just cleaned up code.
Fuseki2 adds security via Apache Shiro. With Shiro, the admin functions
are locked down to "localhost".
Fuseki1 and Fuseki2 are both in the main Jena build and will be in the
next release (before you ask "soon" - we can't set dates with any
reliability because none of us have allocated Jena time; see
"contribute; sponsor; hope").
Not everything will be complete by Fuseki v2.0.0 but it will be at least
as good a Fuseki1, unless you liked the plain old HTML pages. (there is
no velocity templating anymore).
"production ready" for open source is really when users consider it
ready for their usage. Personally, I'd run it in preference to Fuseki1
now. Fuseki1 remains to risk-reduce the transistion from my point-of-view.
Andy
On 10/01/15 00:01, Trevor Donaldson wrote:
Not production ready, yet? Oh no. :-(
On Jan 9, 2015 6:59 PM, "John A. Fereira" <[email protected]> wrote:
I haven't looked at Fuseki2 in a few weeks but did finally get a version
deployed with includes both a TDB and an SDB datastore, running under
Tomcat. I've got a project for which I'll need to use Fuseki and would
like to use Fuseki2 but last time I used it there were still a number of
things that didn't look complete, primarily with the admin interface. How
much progress has been made on that? When you consider Fuseki2 to be
"production ready"?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 6:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fuseki with a web.xml
On 09/01/15 22:11, Trevor Donaldson wrote:
Is it possible to have a Web.xml file with fuseki. I would like to
setup a filter element. Is this possible?
Yes.
See Fuseki2 which is all web.xml driven including as a WAR file. (It
already uses a servlet filter to put Apache Shiro onto the dispatch patch
for security handling.)
Artifacts:
jena-fuseki-server -- standalone jar
jena-fuseki-war -- war file form
jena-fuseki-dist -- for the binary distribution
somewhat like Fuseki1
see the webapp/ directory for the web.xml.
Andy
