Andy, Thanks the links worked. I have the war. The question I have is can I overwrite the shiro.ini file? I see the war but everything is already packaged.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:00 AM, John A. Fereira <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the followup. Your assurance that Fuseki2 is as capable as > Fuseki1 was all I needed to do a bit more work with with. > > Regarding the comment about open source in general, I agree with the quote > you posted. I've been active in the open source community as a contributor > for quite a long time. I think it's important to note that "contributor" > can mean many things, and not just writing code. I was involved in an open > source for higher education organization for many years as a documentation > coordinates, took over maintenance of the conference management application > used by their annual conferences and served on the program committee for > those conferences for five years. I did write some code for the project > but that wasn't my major contribution. > > As I said, I had not looked at Fuseki2 in several weeks and not because my > interaction was based only on hope. I just have too many other projects > I'm working on, almost all open source related, to be engaged as much as I > like with various open source project I use. Several of those projects > are related to the Open Source Vivo semantic web application (vivoweb.org) > for which I've not only made quite a few code contributions to the core > code but am the official maintainer of a suite of data ingest tools (which > use Jena) that are used by VIVO. Additionally, I have built a > configuration of Fuseki going back to when it was called Joseki and bundled > it up and put it on our wiki so that it could be used by the VIVO open > source community. In fact, just before I posted the message about Fuseki2 > yesterday I had built a version from the latest Fuseki-1.1.1 code, put it > on our wiki, and announced it's availability on our developers mailing list. > > Now that I know the status of Fuseki2 I'll be building a Fuseki2 > configuration as well and will be using it for another VIVO related > project, but for the international Agriculture domain (I'm also the > unofficial liaison for the use of VIVO internationally). > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 6:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Fuseki with a web.xml > > John, > > It's helpful if you could describe the specific features that didn't look > complete and what you are looking for for your project. > > Monty Widenius (of MariaDB fame and a certain other database) put it > succinctly: there are 3 ways to interact with an open source project: > contribute; sponsor; hope. > > Laurens Rietveld contriuted integration on the query tab with his YASGUI > javscript user interface for SPARQL endpoints. > > > Fuseki2 is currently at least as capable as Fuseki1, which didn't have > any admin. It's the UI that's most new about Fuseki2. For production > use Fuseki1, had no UI. Fusek1 is deployed as a OS service (or some > custom setup). > > Fuseki2 can run that way - it is compatible with Fuseki1 configuration. > It can also run from a WAR file dropped into a webapp conatiner such > as Tomcat. The execution of SPARQL protocols is the same as Fuseki1, > just cleaned up code. > > Fuseki2 adds security via Apache Shiro. With Shiro, the admin functions > are locked down to "localhost". > > Fuseki1 and Fuseki2 are both in the main Jena build and will be in the > next release (before you ask "soon" - we can't set dates with any > reliability because none of us have allocated Jena time; see > "contribute; sponsor; hope"). > > Not everything will be complete by Fuseki v2.0.0 but it will be at least > as good a Fuseki1, unless you liked the plain old HTML pages. (there is > no velocity templating anymore). > > "production ready" for open source is really when users consider it > ready for their usage. Personally, I'd run it in preference to Fuseki1 > now. Fuseki1 remains to risk-reduce the transistion from my point-of-view. > > Andy > > On 10/01/15 00:01, Trevor Donaldson wrote: > > Not production ready, yet? Oh no. :-( > > On Jan 9, 2015 6:59 PM, "John A. Fereira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I haven't looked at Fuseki2 in a few weeks but did finally get a version > >> deployed with includes both a TDB and an SDB datastore, running under > >> Tomcat. I've got a project for which I'll need to use Fuseki and would > >> like to use Fuseki2 but last time I used it there were still a number of > >> things that didn't look complete, primarily with the admin interface. > How > >> much progress has been made on that? When you consider Fuseki2 to be > >> "production ready"? > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 6:43 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Fuseki with a web.xml > >> > >> On 09/01/15 22:11, Trevor Donaldson wrote: > >>> Is it possible to have a Web.xml file with fuseki. I would like to > >>> setup a filter element. Is this possible? > >>> > >> > >> Yes. > >> > >> See Fuseki2 which is all web.xml driven including as a WAR file. (It > >> already uses a servlet filter to put Apache Shiro onto the dispatch > patch > >> for security handling.) > >> > >> Artifacts: > >> > >> jena-fuseki-server -- standalone jar > >> jena-fuseki-war -- war file form > >> jena-fuseki-dist -- for the binary distribution > >> somewhat like Fuseki1 > >> see the webapp/ directory for the web.xml. > >> > >> Andy > >> > >> > > > >
