good afternoon;

the documentation notes for jena’s sparql s-expression syntax ends with the 
following passage.

  SSE Grammar
  @@ insert grammar here

whereby, the document itself actually already describes all of the 
distinguishing features of the grammar.

the missing information is the enumeration of the operator names and their 
signatures.
it would not even be necessary to have their definitions, as those would likely 
follow from the sparql grammar and language semantics.

is such a list hidden somewhere in the source tree?

best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | [email protected] | http://dydra.com





Reply via email to