good afternoon; On 2015-01-14, at 14:56, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> […] >> >> ok. so, in the lisp sense, these two are the reader and the package >> definitions. >> there still needs to be something which defines the signatures, that is, the >> function types. > > The functions define their signatures. Some are multi-arity; some have > keyword processing (e.g. distinct). And some evaluations isn't even > functional (e.g. &&). that is, no one has compiled the information, the individual function implementation source is the only source and if i use the content of the Tags.java file to search the source i should find everything? > > The idea of a general data structure is that it does not prescribe the > functions or usage. > > The SPARQL algebra defines that for it's usage. > > All "dynamic" in style. > > Andy best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | [email protected] | http://dydra.com
