I didn't change anything from the data downloaded here -
http://opendatacommunities.org/data/homelessness/homelessness-acceptances/ethnicity/dump

Graph ?G does work correctly like so:
SELECT DISTINCT  ?G ?o
WHERE
  {
    GRAPH ?G
      { ?s ?p ?o}
  }

But the WHERE in the second query you gave me (here
http://markmail.org/message/427lyslfsworvnet) also included the following,
which broke it:
?property (rdfs:subPropertyOf)* dim:refPeriod .
?rp rdfs:label ?label

Named graphs definitely exist on the server and I am able to return some
data. As I said, the problem only seems to come when other
prefixes/ontologies are used inside the query?

The query you gave me in your last post (suggest numbering them from now on
for simplicity?) has broken syntax.

On 11 February 2015 at 22:23, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/02/15 22:00, Richard Davenport wrote:
>
>> Regarding my previous queries/posts - http://###/ was replaced with the
>> correct URL of my server in previous queries. The data exists on my server
>> at an IRI different to the original (opendatacommuni.....), so I changed
>> the GRAPH prefix to select that. Your reply seems to suggest I should be
>> doing something else?
>>
>
> Did you change the data you loaded into the database at all?  Is there a
> link to the data you loaded?
>
>  Your first query returns results (though just rp as each distinct subject,
>> rather than objects that are a subPropertyOf refPeriod).
>>
>> The second doesn't return any?
>>
>
> If GRAPH ?G does not return anything, maybe there are no named graphs
> despite datacommunities having them.
>
> Try this (slow) query:
>
> SELECT ?g (count(*) AS ?C)
> { { ?s ?p ?o } UNION { GRAPH ?g { ?s ?p ?o } }
> GROUP BY ?g
>
>         Andy
>
>
>
>> Listing graphs in the usual way (removing the first two lines/filters
>> inside WHERE from your second query) works just fine?
>>
>> On 11 February 2015 at 21:19, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  On 11/02/15 20:48, Richard Davenport wrote:
>>>
>>>  Sincere apologies - that is messed up and not how I drafted it! >.<
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, my point was that queries return sane results - except for when
>>>> involving rdfs: to define what a label is (or any other IRI originating
>>>> from a different/remote server). Therefore could there be an issue with
>>>> my
>>>> Fuseki server retrieving ontologies and such from sources outside of its
>>>> own network? How might I positively identify that? It seems strange
>>>> that I
>>>> get no warnings or errors?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The log file will have errors.  If you have a OntModel, it may look up
>>> owl:imports.
>>>
>>> But if you have a restored copy of the opendatacommunities database, into
>>> TDB, no special processing wrapper, then nothing is being looked up
>>> outside
>>> the server. and for a query, then ontologies are not looked up, the names
>>> are just used.
>>>
>>> If you change PREFIX tgt: <http://###/whatever>
>>> then
>>>
>>> GRAPH tgt:
>>>        { ?subject ?property ?rp}
>>>
>>> is the same as
>>>
>>> GRAPH <http://###/whatever>
>>>        { ?subject ?property ?rp}
>>>
>>> If the original data was in graph
>>>
>>> <http://opendatacommunities.org/graph/homelessness/
>>> homelessness-acceptances/ethnicity>
>>>
>>> then it is still a graph of that name in the copied database.
>>>
>>> GRAPH <http://###/whatever> will fail.
>>> GRAPH <<http://opendatacommunities.org/...> will work.
>>>
>>> GRAPH is just setting the fourth field in all lookups for the quads table
>>> inside the {}.
>>>
>>> Does
>>>
>>> SELECT DISTINCT  ?rp ?label
>>> WHERE
>>>    { ?property (rdfs:subPropertyOf)* dim:refPeriod .
>>>      ?rp rdfs:label ?label}
>>>
>>> work?
>>>
>>> Try also:
>>>
>>> SELECT DISTINCT ?G ?rp ?label
>>> WHERE
>>>    { ?property (rdfs:subPropertyOf)* dim:refPeriod .
>>>      ?rp rdfs:label ?label
>>>      GRAPH ?G
>>>        { ?subject ?property ?rp}
>>>    }
>>>
>>>          Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On 11 February 2015 at 17:27, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   On 11/02/15 15:48, Richard Davenport wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    *PREFIX tgt:
>>>>>
>>>>>  <http://###/odc/homelessness/homelessness-acceptances/
>>>>>> ethnicity>SELECT
>>>>>> DISTINCT  ?rp ?labelWHERE  { ?rp rdfs:label ?label    GRAPH tgt:
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> ?subject <http://opendatacommunities.org/def/ontology/time/refPeriod
>>>>>> <http://opendatacommunities.org/def/ontology/time/refPeriod>> ?rp}
>>>>>> }ORDER
>>>>>> BY ?rpLIMIT   1Simplifying the query as suggested above still yields
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> results (or errors!). Yet, the following query works fine. The
>>>>>> inconsistent
>>>>>> behaviour is very confusing!SELECT DISTINCT  ?rpWHERE  { GRAPH tgt:
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>> ?s <http://opendatacommunities.org/def/ontology/time/refPeriod
>>>>>> <http://opendatacommunities.org/def/ontology/time/refPeriod>> ?rp}
>>>>>> }ORDER
>>>>>> BY ?rpLIMIT   1This and a few other test queries indicate that the
>>>>>> server
>>>>>> is unable to get or otherwise process prefix's outside of it's own
>>>>>> network
>>>>>> (despite having otherwise normal internet access!)? How can I get
>>>>>> Fuseki
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> tell me whether this is the case? Are there any specific connection
>>>>>> protocol/variables required by Fuseki? I'll speak to the network
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> this side but if anyone has an idea please shout.Thanks also Bill for
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> explanation of the cube dimension API. It's something that'll
>>>>>> certainly
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> useful.Cheers,Richard.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Unreadable!
>>>>>
>>>>> What's ### ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Fuseki does not resolve prefixes.  If you have a copy of the data
>>>>> unchanged, use the same prefixes as the original query.  A prefix is
>>>>> just
>>>>> added to the local part to make an IRI.
>>>>>
>>>>>           Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to