Hello Dave,

I see. Ok, then I will go with the adapted ruleset.

Thank you.

Cheers,
Lorenz

> Hi Lorenz,
>
> On 17/10/16 10:48, Lorenz B. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using Apache Jena 3.1.0 for materialization by applying a reasoner
>> and working on an InfModel, i.e.
>>
>> Reasoner reasoner = ReasonerRegistry.getRDFSSimpleReasoner();
>> InfModel infModel = ModelFactory.createInfModel(reasoner, rawModel);
>>
>>
>> For my use case, the RDFS simple ruleset is fine, but this still
>> contains some "trivial" statements for the rdfs:subClassOf closure, i.e.
>> it returns
>>
>> :A rdfs:subClassOf :A  (1)
>>
>>
>> I've seen that the RDFS simple ruleset omits the rules for the
>> transitivity of rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf and there is a
>> comment that this is computed somewhere in the TGC. So I guess that (1)
>> results from the TCG layer?
>
> Yes.
>
>> While beeing correct from an RDFS semantics point of view, is there a
>> way to omit this information by some option or the like?
>
> No, sorry, you would need your own rule set ...
>
>> If not, I can indeed use my own RDFS simple ruleset, which adds
>> not_equals to the corresponding rules.
>
> Dave
>
>
-- 
Lorenz B├╝hmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

Reply via email to