On 04/02/17 14:38, A. Soroka wrote:
Thank you Lorenz, you mean I copy the turtle of my ontology here? It will be
very large?
Then put it on a site like Github or Pastebin and put a link in your message.
Then create a small sample that illustrates the problem.
A minimal-complete-example is not a dump of everything you have. It is
creating a focused question. In fact, just the act of creating it can
help you understand the problem.
Andy
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Feb 4, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Sidra shah <[email protected]> wrote:
Thank you Lorenz, you mean I copy the turtle of my ontology here? It will
be very large?
Actually what makes me confuse, when I run the same query in Protege(with
all Qs,Ans/Options), it works and order the questions.
In Jena, the order by part does not work.
Regards
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Lorenz B. <
[email protected]> wrote:
Sample data is not an abstract description of the data...it is proper
instance data, in best case in TURTLE syntax.
Sample code is still missing.
Sample output is not telling me that something does not work as expected...
"Not in the oder you want" is no real specification. The query will
order by the URIs of the complexity values. If not it's a bug.
But again, we need sample data, sample, code, which is also know as MWE.
And also the Jena version is interesting for the developers.
SELECT *
WHERE { ?questions dd:hasCategory dd:CatPhysics ; dd:hasLevel dd:levEasy
;
dd:hasComplexity ?y} order by ?y
Lorenz, Each question has three categories (subjects), has level , and
recently I added hasComplexity which has values 1-5. I have added a
Complexity class and its members are 1-5 numbers. Domain is Question
class
and range is Complexity class.
The query inside Jena works, load questions/answers/choices etc but not
in
the order I want.
Regards
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Lorenz B. <
[email protected]> wrote:
That doesn't answer my question. Can you try to compare the same queries
please?
Moreover what's missing:
1. sample code
2. sample data
3. sample output
The queries are different because in Protege I retrieve only questions
and
their complexity number while in Jena I get questions, answers,
choices,
scores and its complexity order.
Regards
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Sidra shah <[email protected]>
wrote:
Thank you Lorenz, 1,2,3,4,5 are resources and it has URIs. Question
has
object property and value will be selected from one of the five values
in
the owl file.
Regards
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Lorenz Buehmann
<[email protected]
leipzig.de> wrote:
"object property hasComplexity (its values are 1,2,3,4,5)"
-> why do you say it's an object property if the values are
numerical?
Moreover, you compare two different queries and then say one works in
Protege, the other not. That is a totally useless statement. It
should
be clear that you should compare the SAME queries
It remains open what kind of RDF term the complexity values
are...literals or resources
On 03.02.2017 16:18, Sidra shah wrote:
Hello, This query works fine and get data i-e Questions, answers,
choices
and their score. But when I want to include object property
hasComplexity
(its values are 1,2,3,4,5) and try to order it, its not working.
(The
query
still get data but not in order).
While this works inside Protege and show questions in order:
SELECT *
WHERE { ?questions dd:hasCategory dd:CatPhysics ; dd:hasLevel
dd:levEasy ;
dd:hasComplexity ?y} order by ?y
//This query is in Jena code: I copy here it in Jena syntax
"SELECT * " +
" WHERE { "
+ "?Qs mo:Question ?QsDesc. "
+ "?QS mo:hasAnswers ?AnsQ. "
+ "?AnsQ mo:hasQuestion ?Qs. "
+ "?AnsQ mo:ChoiceOne ?ANSONE."
+ "?AnsQ mo:ChoiceTwo ?ANSWTWO."
+ "?AnsQ mo:ChoiceThree ?ANSWTHREE."
+ "?AnsQ mo:CorrChoice ?ANSCORR. "
+ "?Qs mo:hasCategory ?Cat. "
+ "?Cat mo:category ?CatName. "
+ "?Qs mo:hasLevel ?lev. "
+ "?lev mo:level ?LevName. "
+ "?Qs mo:hasScore ?point."
+ "?point mo:score ?Score. "
+ "?Qs mo:hasComplexity ?l. "
+ "FILTER ( ?CatName ='"+ctg+"' ). "
+ "FILTER ( ?LevName ='"+lvl+"' ). "
+ "}"
+ "ORDER BY (?l) "
+ "";
--
Lorenz Bühmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
--
Lorenz Bühmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
