The print out of query in console is:

SELECT  *  WHERE { ?Qs mo:Question ?QsDesc.
 ?QS mo:hasAnswers ?AnsQ.
?AnsQ mo:hasQuestion ?Qs.
 ?AnsQ mo:ChoiceOne ?ANSONE.
?AnsQ mo:ChoiceTwo ?ANSWTWO.
?AnsQ mo:ChoiceThree ?ANSWTHREE.
?AnsQ mo:CorrChoice ?ANSCORR.
?Qs mo:hasCategory ?Cat.
?Cat mo:category ?CatName.
?Qs mo:hasLevel ?lev.
?lev mo:level ?LevName.
?Qs mo:hasScore ?point.?point mo:score ?Score.
 ?Qs mo:hasComplexity ?l.
 FILTER ( ?CatName ='Physics' ). FILTER ( ?LevName ='Easy' ). }ORDER BY  ?l

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Sidra shah <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have included the hasComplexity property values just in five questions
> and it loads only these five questions, it means it recognizes this
> property but again not in order.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Sidra shah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello, I copied the object properties here. I have object property (which
>> has problem) hasComplexity. Its domain is Question and range is Complexity
>> class. Complexity class have now members A,B,C
>>
>>
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>
>>
>> <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
>>     <!ENTITY owl "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"; >
>>     <!ENTITY xsd "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"; >
>>     <!ENTITY rdfs "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"; >
>>     <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; >
>>     <!ENTITY named "http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/named#";
>> >
>>     <!ENTITY myOWL "http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#";
>> >
>> ]>
>>
>>
>> <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#";
>>      xml:base="http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL";
>>      xmlns:named="http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/named#";
>>      xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";
>>      xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#";
>>      xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#";
>>      xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
>>      xmlns:myOWL="http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#";>
>>     <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.semantic
>> web.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL"/>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!--
>>     ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ///////////////////////////
>>     //
>>     // Object Properties
>>     //
>>     ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> ///////////////////////////
>>      -->
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!-- http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#hasAnswers
>> -->
>>
>>     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&myOWL;hasAnswers">
>>         <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;InverseFunctionalProperty"/>
>>         <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&myOWL;Answers"/>
>>         <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&myOWL;Questions"/>
>>         <owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="&myOWL;hasQuestion"/>
>>     </owl:ObjectProperty>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!-- http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#hasCategory
>> -->
>>
>>     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&myOWL;hasCategory"/>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!-- http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#hasComp
>> lexity -->
>>
>>     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&myOWL;hasComplexity">
>>         <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&myOWL;Complexity"/>
>>         <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&myOWL;Questions"/>
>>     </owl:ObjectProperty>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!-- http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#hasLevel
>> -->
>>
>>     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&myOWL;hasLevel"/>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!-- http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#hasQuestion
>> -->
>>
>>     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&myOWL;hasQuestion">
>>         <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;InverseFunctionalProperty"/>
>>         <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&myOWL;Answers"/>
>>         <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&myOWL;Questions"/>
>>     </owl:ObjectProperty>
>>
>>
>>
>>     <!-- http://www.semanticweb.org/t/ontologies/2016/7/myOWL#hasScore
>> -->
>>
>>     <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&myOWL;hasScore"/>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/02/17 14:38, A. Soroka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Lorenz, you mean I copy the turtle of my ontology here? It
>>>>> will be very large?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then put it on a site like Github or Pastebin and put a link in your
>>>> message.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then create a small sample that illustrates the problem.
>>>
>>> A minimal-complete-example is not a dump of everything you have.  It is
>>> creating a focused question.  In fact, just the act of creating it can help
>>> you understand the problem.
>>>
>>>     Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> A. Soroka
>>>> The University of Virginia Library
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 4, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Sidra shah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Lorenz, you mean I copy the turtle of my ontology here? It
>>>>> will
>>>>> be very large?
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually what makes me confuse, when I run the same query in
>>>>> Protege(with
>>>>> all Qs,Ans/Options), it works and order the questions.
>>>>> In Jena, the order by part does not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Lorenz B. <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sample data is not an abstract description of the data...it is proper
>>>>>> instance data, in best case in TURTLE syntax.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sample code is still missing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sample output is not telling me that something does not work as
>>>>>> expected...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Not in the oder you want" is no real specification. The query will
>>>>>> order by the URIs of the complexity values. If not it's a bug.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But again, we need sample data, sample, code, which is also know as
>>>>>> MWE.
>>>>>> And also the Jena version is interesting for the developers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SELECT *
>>>>>>> WHERE { ?questions dd:hasCategory dd:CatPhysics ; dd:hasLevel
>>>>>>> dd:levEasy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dd:hasComplexity ?y} order by ?y
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lorenz, Each question has three categories (subjects), has level ,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> recently I added hasComplexity which has values 1-5. I have added a
>>>>>>> Complexity class and its members are 1-5 numbers. Domain is Question
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> class
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and range is Complexity class.
>>>>>>> The query inside Jena works, load questions/answers/choices etc but
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the order I want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Lorenz B. <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That doesn't answer my question. Can you try to compare the same
>>>>>>>> queries
>>>>>>>> please?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Moreover what's missing:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. sample code
>>>>>>>> 2. sample data
>>>>>>>> 3. sample output
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The queries are different because in Protege I retrieve only
>>>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> their complexity number while in Jena I get questions, answers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> choices,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> scores and its complexity order.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Sidra shah <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you Lorenz, 1,2,3,4,5 are resources and it has URIs. Question
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> object property and value will be selected from one of the five
>>>>>>>>>> values
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the owl file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Lorenz Buehmann
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "object property hasComplexity (its values are 1,2,3,4,5)"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -> why do you say it's an object property if the values are
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> numerical?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Moreover, you compare two different queries and then say one
>>>>>>>>>>> works in
>>>>>>>>>>> Protege, the other not. That is a totally useless statement. It
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> be clear that you should compare the SAME queries
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It remains open what kind of RDF term the complexity values
>>>>>>>>>>> are...literals or resources
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 03.02.2017 16:18, Sidra shah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, This query works fine and get data i-e Questions,
>>>>>>>>>>>> answers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> choices
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> and their score. But when I want to include object property
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> hasComplexity
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (its values are 1,2,3,4,5) and try to order it, its not working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (The
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> still get data but not in order).
>>>>>>>>>>>> While this works inside Protege and show questions in order:
>>>>>>>>>>>> SELECT *
>>>>>>>>>>>> WHERE { ?questions dd:hasCategory dd:CatPhysics ; dd:hasLevel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> dd:levEasy ;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> dd:hasComplexity ?y} order by ?y
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> //This query is in Jena code: I copy here it in Jena syntax
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "SELECT  * " +
>>>>>>>>>>>>                " WHERE { "
>>>>>>>>>>>>               + "?Qs mo:Question ?QsDesc. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?QS mo:hasAnswers ?AnsQ. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?AnsQ mo:hasQuestion ?Qs. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?AnsQ mo:ChoiceOne ?ANSONE."
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?AnsQ mo:ChoiceTwo ?ANSWTWO."
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?AnsQ mo:ChoiceThree ?ANSWTHREE."
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?AnsQ mo:CorrChoice ?ANSCORR. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>               + "?Qs mo:hasCategory ?Cat. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?Cat mo:category ?CatName. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "?Qs mo:hasLevel ?lev. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>               + "?lev mo:level ?LevName. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>               + "?Qs mo:hasScore ?point."
>>>>>>>>>>>>               + "?point mo:score ?Score. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 + "?Qs mo:hasComplexity ?l. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "FILTER ( ?CatName ='"+ctg+"' ). "
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "FILTER ( ?LevName ='"+lvl+"' ). "
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>           + "}"
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   + "ORDER BY  (?l) "
>>>>>>>>>>>>                + "";
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Lorenz Bühmann
>>>>>>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>>>>>>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Lorenz Bühmann
>>>>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>>>>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to