On 04/03/17 12:45, A. Soroka wrote:
> It is not in any obvious way part of the current remit for the Jena
> project.
Why not?!
Isn't LDP for RDF just another service over the data?
Andy
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Mar 4, 2017, at 7:40 AM, Laura Morales <laure...@mail.com> wrote:
This message is very confusing.
I was asking whether it would be possible to add another (more friendly) query
language to Fuseki, or not?
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2017 at 1:32 PM
From: baran...@gmail.com
To: users@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fuseki support other query languages
I think it was a false estimation to allure SQL folks for Semantic Web
with SPARQL.
SPARQL is rather cumbersome and counter-intuitive to work with...
and that was one of the important reasons, why they ignored SPARQL. There
are also other reasons. But the most important one is: No revolution
basing on the help of the past.
I was wondering whether it would be possible to support in Fuseki some
other more friendly query language, such as graphql or gremlin.
I don't know much about graphql...
I don't know much about gremlin...
But i know that it would have been much better trying to develope a new
query language starting from scratch and supporting intuitively usage of a
simple RDFS-design. Also for better performance...
But about ten years ago, confrontated with SPARQL, i also thought, very
good idea, i have 2-3 years experience with SQL and i have an open door to
Semantic Web revolution...
thanks, baran
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
