> The question is a bit unclear. If there is no existing vocabulary that > you can resp. want to reuse, then you have to use your own vocabulary > which basically just means to use your own URIs for the predicates.
Right, so let's say I don't want to define any new vocabulary, but I just want to use some predicates. For example a predicate called "predicate1" and "predicate2". These are not meant to be shared, I use them for whatever reason and I take full responsibility to shooting myself in the foot. Is there any "catch-all" or "default/undefined" vocabulary that I can use? I mean something like a default vocabulary that parses as valid URIs, but whose meaning is undefined (= the interpretation is left to the user)? Something like "<subject> <undefined:predicate1> <object>" and "<subject> <undefined:predicate2> <object>"... I wonder if I should use "<subject> <_:predicate1> <object>" but I'm not sure?!
