It is for this reason that I use <urn:example:...> and as a nod to my Cisco engineer days and example.org... :-)
As Martynas Jusevičius said give it a little thought. On 12 April 2017 at 17:37, Martynas Jusevičius <[email protected]> wrote: > It would not be an error as long it is a valid URI. > > Conceptually non-HTTP URIs go against Linked Data principles because > normally they cannot be dereferenced. > > Therefore it makes sense to give it a little thought and choose an > http:// namespace that you control. > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Laura Morales <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I use "urn:ex:..." in a lot of my test code (short for "urn:example:"). > >> > >> Then the predicate is "urn:ex:time/now" or "urn:ex:time/duration" or > >> whatever you need... > > > > would it be an error (perhaps conceptually) to use "ex:...", essentially > removing the "urn:" scheme? >
