Thank you Claire Qiu
On Friday, 6 October 2017, 16:50:49 GMT+1, claire Qiu
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
as far as I understood, any inferred results are consistent with the KB.
They are the logical consequence of KB.
However, the facts inserted by SPARQL might violate with the KB, no
consistency checking involved.
Inferencing is a service provided by Description Logics, SPARQL is just a
language protocol with basic graph pattern matching.
These are just my understanding, might not be rigid.
Cheers,
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Diogo FC Patrao <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please forgive any mistakes below.
>
> SPARQL is a language to deal with data; OWL is meant to deal with concepts.
>
> You may argue that both can produce the same results. However there is an
> important difference: the language.
>
> As using owl one may represent both concepts and their relations in the
> same language, it allows producing new relations. I think you can't do that
> on SPARQL.
>
> Sure SPARQL may be faster and may even yield results impossible in OWL, but
> it is similar to write code in any programming language.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Em 6 de out de 2017 11:09, "Abduladem Eljamel"
> <[email protected]> escreveu:
>
> >
> > Hello,,
> >
> > My simple understanding of Inferencing is “inferring new facts
> > fromexisting facts”. In that sense, I believe that there are some
> > similarities of INSERT command in SPARQL.
> >
> > Can SPARQL be utilised in Inferencing?
> >
> > Are there any researches in investigating the cons and pros of
> usingSPARQL
> > as reasoner?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Abdul
> >
>
