Not really. Only in source code, but this part is not open-source. It's a layer above Linked Data Templates: https://atomgraph.github.io/Linked-Data-Templates/
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Abduladem Eljamel < [email protected]> wrote: > Thankyou very much Martynas. it realy helps. > Currently, I am wrting a report. I woud like to wrtie something like what > you mentioned in your email but I have to refernece it. do you any refrence > say what have said? > ThanksAbdul > > On Friday, 6 October 2017, 17:48:54 GMT+1, Martynas Jusevičius < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Abduladem, > > you can use both CONSTRUCT and INSERT to infer new triples. > > Both OWL and SPARQL have their advantages. OWL forms ontologies that you > can import etc., but often it produces too many (trivial) triples that you > don't care about, and performance can be poor. With SPARQL you can be more > precise with your patterns and execute faster. > > As always, it depends on the use case. Given that few triplestores offer > inferencing and we don't want to reason over the whole dataset, we use > SPARQL to infer things like inverse properties, and then when the result is > loaded, we use OWL over the (small) result to infer subclasses and types > etc. > > Hope it helps. > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Abduladem Eljamel < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello,, > > > > My simple understanding of Inferencing is “inferring new facts > > fromexisting facts”. In that sense, I believe that there are some > > similarities of INSERT command in SPARQL. > > > > Can SPARQL be utilised in Inferencing? > > > > Are there any researches in investigating the cons and pros of > usingSPARQL > > as reasoner? > > > > Thanks > > Abdul > > >
