No - and not in the archives:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdeb6672e894fed26ef163b8e090d6a95d168009ad18be4c9a5dc5ab7%40%3Cusers.jena.apache.org%3E
Lists don't accept arbitrary attachments - it's part of the anti-spam
measures.
Andy
On 06/01/2021 12:27, Deepali Singhavi wrote:
Hi Andy,
I am using the same configuration file on my system and they are working
for me.
Attaching them again. Can you please check it now?
Regards,
Deepali
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 8:12 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi - attachments of configuration and data didn't make it (to me at
least).
On 04/01/2021 04:56, Deepali Singhavi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement indexing for Fuseki using
> Lucene/ElasticSearch using an assembler configuration file
(attaching
> file for reference) but there is no improvement in performance
> (performance without index is better than with index).
>
> I am using sample data from *films.ttl* file.
>
> *Sample Query *
> PREFIX text: <http://jena.apache.org/text#
<http://jena.apache.org/text#> <http://jena.apache.org/text#
<http://jena.apache.org/text#>>>
> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>>>
> select ?subject ?object
> WHERE {
> # Without Index
> #?subject rdfs:label ?object .
> #FILTER contains(?object,"City")
> #With Index
> ?subject text:query (rdfs:label "city").
> ?subject rdfs:label ?object .
> }
>
> *Performance:*
>
> No of Triples
>
>
>
> No of Runs
>
>
>
> Without Index
>
>
>
> Lucene Index
>
>
>
> ElasticSearch Index
>
> 6918
>
>
>
> 1
>
>
>
> 16ms
>
>
>
> 18ms
>
>
>
> 19ms
>
> 2
>
>
>
> 29ms
>
>
>
> 32ms
>
>
>
> 32ms
>
> 3
>
>
>
> 22ms
>
>
>
> 23ms
>
>
>
> 21ms
>
> 4
>
>
>
> 22ms
>
>
>
> 14ms
>
>
>
> 53ms
>
> 5
>
>
>
> 15ms
>
>
>
> 19ms
>
>
>
> 18ms
>
>
> Please let me know if any other information is required from my side
> and please suggest how I can improve performance.
>
> Regards,
> Deepali
>
