On 28/10/2024 10:42, jaa...@kolumbus.fi wrote:
Hello, thanks for your answer.

I don't see why you said UI doesn't work.
It was a mistake, I'm sorry. It works, but currentky I have problems with 
version 5.1.0.

Let me explain:
I have been running image docker.io/stain/jena-fuseki:3.14.0 for years without 
problems, but after upgrade to 5.x I started to get problems.

I pulled  docker.io/stain/jena-fuseki:5.1.0 from docker hub, deployed into my 
test server and started to test. I tried to update my jena-fuseki-database 
running in podman container by reading an excel-file line by line in 
Python-code and running 6 sparql updates for each line. My excel-file has 21 
412 lines.

With 3.14.0-version this update passed in 4 and half hours, but with 5.1.0 it 
does not pass at all; either the execution stops for running out of memory or 
it stops for error message “Maximum lock count exceeded”.

In 5.1.0 the execution also slows down: In the beginning about 50 rows/minute 
become handled but after 5 hours only 5 rows/minute become handled. I guess 
this is due to running short of memory.

I also guess that there are no memory leaks, but the carbage collection should 
be configured in different manner. We have just the following settings in our 
container run command:
                                       --memory 6g \
                                       --env="JVM_ARGS"="-Xms6144m -Xmx6144m" \

Maybe I should have something else, too. What ?

1. Check that the client is properly reading the whole of the response 9even if zero bytes) and is actually closing the connection, or returning it to the connection pool. Check by running "netstat" to see TCp connections ("-t" on *nix)

2. On Windows - don't run client and server on the same machine; Windows is slow to recycle TCP connections under load.


Thanks so much if you could help !
Br, Jaana


28.10.2024 12.00 EET Lorenz Buehmann <buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> 
kirjoitti:

The advice was to simply try out version 5.1.0 from the
stain/jena-fuseki repo: https://hub.docker.com/r/stain/jena-fuseki/tags

The image does nothing more than downloading Fuseki dist tarball,
setting all things up and starting the server. I don't see why you said
UI doesn't work.


Lorenz

On 28.10.24 06:09, jaa...@kolumbus.fi wrote:
Hello, you write below, that stain/* shouldn't be used as it is not part of 
Apache Jena project and that there's 5.1.0 in dockerhub. Yes, there are several 
5.* images in dockerhub, but I don't know which ones of them are part of Apache 
Jena project. Can you help ?

Jaana


17.10.2024 14.38 EEST Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> kirjoitti:

On 17/10/2024 10:31, jaa...@kolumbus.fi wrote:
You should upgrade to Jena 5.x to get security updates.
The problem is that UI does not work in stain/jena-fuseki-version higher than 
4.0.0.
1. stain/* is not a product of the Apache Jena project.

2. Are you sure? There is a 5.1.0 on dockerhub.

      Andy

Jaana

17.10.2024 11.45 EEST Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> kirjoitti:

On 17/10/2024 03:37, jaa...@kolumbus.fi wrote:
I'm running docker.io/stain/jena-fuseki:3.14.0 in podman container on linux redHat host. I a very heavy load it can happen that /var/log/messages-file receives huge amount of INFO-level messages from jena-fuseki. How can I change the log level of my container to get rid of these messages ? This is similar with https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71615972/change-jena-fuseki-logging-level https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71615972/change-jena-fuseki-logging-level , but the problem now is that I cannot find the file log4j2.properties from inside the container. Br, Jaana
3.14.0 used log4j1  The file will be called log4j.properties.

If it does not exist, then the server uses a built in default. You can
place a logging setup in the container at the expected pl;ace and it
should use on start-up.

You should upgrade to Jena 5.x to get security updates.

        Andy

--
Lorenz Bühmann
Research Associate/Scientific Developer

Email buehm...@infai.org

Institute for Applied Informatics e.V. (InfAI) | Goerdelerring 9 | 04109 
Leipzig | Germany

Reply via email to