Thanks for your answer.
I do use the latest stable version of Kannel (1.0.3-1) and I did try to install/compile the 1.1.5 development version, however, ./configure complains that my libxml is too old.
[root@s1 gateway-1.1.5] rpm -q libxml gives libxml-1.8.10-1
[root@s1 gateway-1.1.5] rpm -q libxml2 gives libxml2-2.4.5-1
I can't seem to find a libxml (1) in a much newer version than 1.8.10 so I wonder if it really means libxml2 and in that case what can I do to make it run ./configure?
Is there a binary release af development Kannel? Even rpm maybe?
Regards,
Thomas
"Gildas PERROT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18-09-2001 10:29 ZE2
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
bcc:
Subject: RE: EMI_IP message values vs. Operator
If you want some help, you should specify which version of Kannel you use,
the configuration contents and the URL used.
I can also suggest you to read EMI specification
(http://www.cmgtele.com/docs/SMSC_EMI_specification_3.5.pdf) in order to
understand each EMI fields and try the last stable Kannel version with emi2
driver which is better than emi_ip for many reasons. It is even in good
shape with development or CVS versions.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2001 13:32
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : EMI_IP message values vs. Operator
>
>
>
> I trying to get Kannel to cooperate with my SMS operator. My
> problems begin
> when I try to send a message:
>
> 2001-09-14 08:37:20 [3] DEBUG: emi 1 message
> 00/00078/0/51/28145457/1919/////0100////////////3//466F6F626172///
> //////////E5
> 2001-09-14 08:37:35 [3] INFO: emi_submit _smsmessage: wait for ack failed!
> 2001-09-14 08:37:25 [3] DEBUG: Submit Error...
>
> After mailing this to my SMS operator I'm told that the message should be
> like this:
>
> 00/00074/O/51/28145215/2020/////////////////3//466F6F626172/////////////20
>
> What is the reason for these differences and what do I do to fix it?
> Is it possible to force the values in the messages somehow?
>
> -- Thomas
>
>
>
