Thank you to the user group for your help.
I have the test_ppg program working properly, largely based on PAP/SI
control files provided with Kannel source code.
Currently, I'm trying to send a PUSH message to an IP address. Since the
sample control files use a phone number rather than an IP address as the
PUSH recipient, I found some User Group archive messages with examples of
Push Control Document entries appropriate for such a configuration. One such
example (for the <address address-value ...> entry) follows:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Therefore, I placed the following line in my push control document:
WAPPUSH=3DMY_IP_ADDRESS/TYPE=3DIPv4@MY_DOMAIN"/>
Where MY_IP_ADDRESS and MY_DOMAIN contain the values appropriate for
my desktop and site (rather than ppg.carrier.com).
When I run my push control document with the WAPPUSH entry listed above
through the PPG using the 'test_ppg' program, the program generates the
following message:
2002-07-05 21:06:32 [1] DEBUG: TEST_PPG: and type bad message
response
Note that the same thing occurs if I remove the '3D' text from my
definition, above. I've also tried using IPv6 rather than IPv4 as shown in
the example.
In various places on the web, I've located several different suggestions for
formatting the WAPPUSH entry (in the <address address-value ..> entry).
These suggestions are consistent with the format that I've used. Therefore,
my questions are
* Are there any changes I should/need to make to the format of my
WAPPUSH entry, so that test_ppg can send a PUSH message through the Kannel
PPG to an IP-based recipient (in this case the WAP emulator provided with
the Nokia Toolkit)?
* Are there any specific entries in my kannel.conf file (under the
group = ppg heading most likely) that need to be changed when sending a PUSH
to an IP address rather than to a phone number?
Thank you for your help.
Ira Rosen
