Rosen Ira-IROSEN1 kirjoittaa lauantaina, 6. hein�kuuta 2002, kello 00:54:Thank you to the user group for your help. > I have the test_ppg program working properly, largely based on PAP/SI > control files provided with Kannel source code. > Currently, I'm trying to send a PUSH message to an IP address. Since the > sample control files use a phone number rather than an IP address as the > PUSH recipient, I found some User Group archive messages with examples > of > Push Control Document entries appropriate for such a configuration. One > such > example (for the <address address-value ...> entry) follows: > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Therefore, I placed the following line in my push control document: > WAPPUSH=3DMY_IP_ADDRESS/TYPE=3DIPv4@MY_DOMAIN"/> > Where MY_IP_ADDRESS and MY_DOMAIN contain the values appropriate for > my desktop and site (rather than ppg.carrier.com). > > When I run my push control document with the WAPPUSH entry listed above > through the PPG using the 'test_ppg' program, the program generates the > following message: > 2002-07-05 21:06:32 [1] DEBUG: TEST_PPG: and type bad message > response > Note that the same thing occurs if I remove the '3D' text from my > definition, above. I've also tried using IPv6 rather than IPv4 as shown > in > the example. > > In various places on the web, I've located several different > suggestions for > formatting the WAPPUSH entry (in the <address address-value ..> entry). > These suggestions are consistent with the format that I've used. > Therefore, > my questions are > * Are there any changes I should/need to make to the format of my > WAPPUSH entry, so that test_ppg can send a PUSH message through the > Kannel > PPG to an IP-based recipient (in this case the WAP emulator provided > with > the Nokia Toolkit)?
Address should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are an example control document with ip address in test/iptestppg.txt > * Are there any specific entries in my kannel.conf file (under the > group = ppg heading most likely) that need to be changed when sending a > PUSH > to an IP address rather than to a phone number? No. All addressing is specified in pap control document. Aarno
