thanks, it appears to have installed, now I can configure it and hopefully
it should work...

maybe I should have just looked at the rpm switches more closely?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Daniel Wood
Cc: Kwok Peng Tuck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Installation issues 



rpm -i --force --nodeps then?

(sorry, --nodeps was probably the option you needed to begin with - my bad).

----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri  September 20, 2002  12:54 PM
From: Daniel Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rene Kluwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Kwok Peng Tuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Installation issues  

Rene, I *think* it was installed by rpm, although 'm not sure as I didn't
build this box (and the rpm is present on the file system). Anyhow the
--force option didn't work (I had already tried it).
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:29 PM
To: Kwok Peng Tuck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Installation issues 

Did you install mysql from source in stead of rpm?
In that case, you can safely use the --force option of rpm.

-- Rene...

----- Original Message -----
Date: Fri  September 20, 2002  07:08 PM
From: Kwok Peng Tuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Installation issues 

have you executed ldconfig ?

Daniel Wood wrote:

>Hi guys, im currently having some installtion problems with the kannel rpm.
>What should be a simple operation is taking a stupid amount of time to do. 
>Its keeps hanging on the following:
>error: failed dependencies:
>        libcrypto.so.0.9.6   is needed by kannel-1.2.0-1
>        libssl.so.0.9.6   is needed by kannel-1.2.0-1
>
>now both these files are in /lib and /usr/lib on a redhat 7.2 box with
>read/execute permissions, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib is in teh env,
>so I dont know what is going on. Does any one have any ideas? (its probably
>quiet obvious, but I cant see it).
>
>Thanks,
>Dan
>
>
>  
>


Reply via email to