Hello Wilf,

Well... the one last thing that you can check is if /usr/lib is
mentioned in /etc/ld.so.conf.
If not... put it there, run ldconfig and then see.

That not being the problem, I have no idea either.

-- Rene...

Saturday, September 21, 2002, 1:22:21 AM, you wrote:

WNW> i spent many hours trying to install that rpm (on redhat 7.2).

WNW> IMHO, the person who made the rpm package had a version of the openssl rpm
WNW> installed that registered the package "libcrypto.so" with the rpm database -
WNW> this is no longer the case with the openssl rpm.  therefore that person (or
WNW> the software they used to create the rpm) assumed that this would be the
WNW> case on all systems that had the openssl rpm installed.  (tbh, i put it down
WNW> to openssl changing the way they do things rather than a badly made rpm.)

WNW> i upgraded my openssl rpm to no effect.

WNW> whats infuriating here is that libcrypto.so is actually installed in
WNW> /usr/lib (presumably from the openssl install).

WNW> and i couldnt get the --force --no-deps options to help either.

WNW> of course, i could just be missing something really simple...

WNW> my advice to redhat users is not to bother with the rpm (tbh, i never use
WNW> rpms for actual services if i can help it) especially as the source
WNW> compilation is quite straight forward for kannel and there are quite a few
WNW> bug fixes in the daily snapshot.

WNW> coming to think of it, i dont think that anyone on this list has mentioned
WNW> that they've had a successful rpm install - did the binaries, etc actually
WNW> install for you Daniel?


WNW> Wilf


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Wood
>> Sent: Friday, 20 September 2002 10:55 PM
>> To: 'Rene Kluwen'
>> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>> Subject: RE: Installation issues
>>
>>
>> thanks, it appears to have installed, now I can configure it and hopefully
>> it should work...
>>
>> maybe I should have just looked at the rpm switches more closely?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:53 PM
>> To: Daniel Wood
>> Cc: Kwok Peng Tuck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Installation issues
>>
>>
>>
>> rpm -i --force --nodeps then?
>>
>> (sorry, --nodeps was probably the option you needed to begin with
>> - my bad).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Date: Fri  September 20, 2002  12:54 PM
>> From: Daniel Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Rene Kluwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> cc: Kwok Peng Tuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Installation issues
>>
>> Rene, I *think* it was installed by rpm, although 'm not sure as I didn't
>> build this box (and the rpm is present on the file system). Anyhow the
>> --force option didn't work (I had already tried it).
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:29 PM
>> To: Kwok Peng Tuck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Installation issues
>>
>> Did you install mysql from source in stead of rpm?
>> In that case, you can safely use the --force option of rpm.
>>
>> -- Rene...
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Date: Fri  September 20, 2002  07:08 PM
>> From: Kwok Peng Tuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Installation issues
>>
>> have you executed ldconfig ?
>>
>> Daniel Wood wrote:
>>
>> >Hi guys, im currently having some installtion problems with the
>> kannel rpm.
>> >What should be a simple operation is taking a stupid amount of
>> time to do.
>> >Its keeps hanging on the following:
>> >error: failed dependencies:
>> >        libcrypto.so.0.9.6   is needed by kannel-1.2.0-1
>> >        libssl.so.0.9.6   is needed by kannel-1.2.0-1
>> >
>> >now both these files are in /lib and /usr/lib on a redhat 7.2 box with
>> >read/execute permissions, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib is
>> in teh env,
>> >so I dont know what is going on. Does any one have any ideas?
>> (its probably
>> >quiet obvious, but I cant see it).
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Dan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>



-- 
Best regards,
 Rene                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to