If you search backwards in the archives I had a couple conversations
regarding the clean termination of bearerbox and wapbox on cygwin. The
consensus was that cygwin's pthread implmentation was quite complete, or
that the thread communication was a little off. Does anyone know if
progress has been made on this front? Because of this issue I have left
them running in shells instead of installing it as a service - it was a
real pain to bring the programs down when they were owned by the system.
I have been using 1.3.1 for over six months I think quite happily on cygwin.
Josh
Zohar wrote:
anyone else had experience with Kannel over cygwin? good/bad...?
----- Original Message -----
From: "António Vaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: Kannel on Windows
yes. but you need to install cygwin also.
however, kannel seems to be unstable on windows. the smsbox exits many
times without warning.
i used it on a windows machine for internal tests but deployed it on a
linux machine for production.
also you get less performance as kannel runs on top of cygwin layer.
regards,
Antonio
