Re: Kannel on Windows

[Kwok Peng Tuck]

For me I have to normally kill smsbox first, only then bearerbox would 
shutdown properly. Sometimes that doesn't even work. Fortunately, I just 
use cygwin to do limited testing on kannel :D

Josh Steinhurst wrote:

    If you search backwards in the archives I had a couple 
conversations regarding the clean termination of bearerbox and wapbox 
on cygwin. The consensus was that cygwin's pthread implmentation was 
quite complete, or that the thread communication was a little off. 
Does anyone know if progress has been made on this front? Because of 
this issue I have left them running in shells instead of installing it 
as a service - it was a real pain to bring the programs down when they 
were owned by the system. I have been using 1.3.1 for over six months 
I think quite happily on cygwin.

Josh

Zohar wrote:

anyone else had experience with Kannel over cygwin? good/bad...?

----- Original Message ----- From: "António Vaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: Kannel on Windows


yes. but you need to install cygwin also.

however, kannel seems to be unstable on windows. the smsbox exits many


times without warning.

i used it on a windows machine for internal tests but deployed it on a


linux machine for production.

also you get less performance as kannel runs on top of cygwin layer.

regards,
Antonio