On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:48, David Meier wrote: > It makes sense as long as nobody charges for the sent SMS. Let's make > things clearer: Our setup lets our users write SMS via a web interface to > any other mobile they want including themselves. The SMSC provider we have > lets us overwrite the sender address. maybe a simple appended field to fool Kannel into believing that the sender and reciever are not the same. > It would now be possible for the users to send SMS to any other mobile and > set the the sender address the same as recipient (whatever sense that > makes). However, we use the dlrurl to do some further message processing > including accounting for the users. And since that url is not being > executed we have a problem there... dlrurl for accounting !! is not a good idea. get-url or post-url should be used or your web-interface should do that as a side effect.
-Tarun -- http://www.tarundua.net Nothing you ever wanted to find about Tarun Dua
