James Coleman <jamesc 'at' doolin.com> writes: [...]
> Guillaume has obviously been working on this ... > Together with patches to improve performance > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03107.html > 17th May > > Thank you Guillaume! :) np :) however, notice that these are not figures with real SMSC connections, but with the "fake" SMSC, which will certainly have a lower response time and a lighter protocol. [...] > I just tested different operators with Nokia 30 GSM terminal. > I used Lynx and http GET request to send 20 messages at time. Here are my > resulsts: > > Operator 1 2.85 s/message > Operator 1 2.75 > Operator 2 3.2 > Operator 3 2.9 > > So it took almost three second to send one message. > Using direct SMSC connection all 20 messages were sent in less than second. > > If someone has tested some other GSM modems, it would be interesting to see > results. > > > Can anyone do better than that? :) His figures are obtained using a GSM phone, not an SMSC, so these are not very interesting either for your aim IMHO. -- Guillaume Cottenceau
