**>Subject: Re: AW: WAP 2.0 via HTTP? **>From: Enver ALTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **>To: [email protected] **>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **>Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:01:27 +0300 **> **>Hey, **> **>On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:58 +0200, Krofczik, Holger wrote: **>> I forgot to mention that I'm looking for a proxy that can handle (i.e. **>> compile) wmlscript - therefor squid isn't an adequate solution, i **>> guess? **> **>I have limited experience with WAP 2.0 but I think Squid will work. **>Hopefully someone with more WAP 2.0 knowledge will correct me if I'm **>wrong.
Squid is not a good choice. It does not support chunked encoding which alot of microbrowsers use since they are either too lazy or too limited in bufer space for proper handling upload content to the HTTP server. See ya... d.c.
