Yep, I agree, each time I must remember to replace the sender.
Reply-to: lists are just wrong.
If you want to reply to the list, you should, if you want to reply to
the sender, that's what you should do.
it's incredibly rare that someone wants to reply to the sender only
Sensible mailers like mutt have r for reply to the sender and l for
list-reply.
that's good to know. in pine it asks me if i want to use the reply-to or
the sender so roughly the same.
If the list is set to be the reply-to, then all manner of rubbish is
sent back to the list, like when subscribers screw up rules and their
mail auto-replies to the list (etc etc etc).
i've seen this before. not sure what other rubbish you're referring to but
this is a pretty convincing argument against reply to lists. can we
possibly solve this with a policy on the list though?
cheers
iain
