I saw your path in development mailing list, but you don't state the patch againts what kannel version, CVS or 1.4.1 ?
Thanks _____ From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:23 AM To: fajar Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: get mesage ID without DLR Ok, just sent my patch to the devel list. If you're not subscribed let me know and I'll forward it to you (I don't want to cross-post with patches on the users list). Regards, Alex On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:09 PM, fajar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wow, that's a good idea, I can get the submit_sm_resp message_id from kannel right now. Usually I must relate MT transaction with DLR with special number. I can't wait the patch :-) Fajar _____ From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 3:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: get mesage ID without DLR I'm finishing a patch to be able to grab the submit_sm_resp message_id field and use it with a paremter on the dlr-url (I've chose the "%w" parameter for this). You'll need a mask anyway, only that the "dlr" won't come from the carrier but from inside kannel itself. Will post it to the list later so it can be also tested by other people. Stay tuned ;) Regards, Alejandro On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Gustavo Mohme C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I am currently using mask=31. Nevertheless, it is generating unnecessary traffic since I am only interested in getting the message_id from the submit_sm_resp. Is there a way to get the message_id without using mask=#? The reason I only need to get the message_id is because, after the id is stored, I use query_sm to check the status(SMSC doesn't support DLR) of the message. What would be the simplest mask value that would get this job done(mask=1 maybe?). Thanks a lot! Gustavo
