Very good idea Alejandro !
Thanks for your help.
Cyril
fajar a écrit :
I saw your path in development mailing list, but you don’t state the
patch againts what kannel version, CVS or 1.4.1 ?
Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Friday, September 19, 2008 10:23 AM
*To:* fajar
*Cc:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR
Ok, just sent my patch to the devel list.
If you're not subscribed let me know and I'll forward it to you (I
don't want to cross-post with patches on the users list).
Regards,
Alex
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:09 PM, fajar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Wow, that's a good idea, I can get the submit_sm_resp message_id from
kannel right now. Usually I must relate MT transaction with DLR with
special number. I can't wait the patch J
Fajar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
*Sent:* Friday, September 19, 2008 3:51 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR
I'm finishing a patch to be able to grab the submit_sm_resp message_id
field and use it with a paremter on the dlr-url (I've chose the "%w"
parameter for this). You'll need a mask anyway, only that the "dlr"
won't come from the carrier but from inside kannel itself.
Will post it to the list later so it can be also tested by other people.
Stay tuned ;)
Regards,
Alejandro
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Gustavo Mohme C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi All,
I am currently using mask=31. Nevertheless, it is generating
unnecessary traffic since I am only interested in getting the
message_id from the submit_sm_resp. Is there a way to get the
message_id without using mask=#?
The reason I only need to get the message_id is because, after the id
is stored, I use query_sm to check the status(SMSC doesn't support
DLR) of the message. What would be the simplest mask value that would
get this job done(mask=1 maybe?).
Thanks a lot!
Gustavo
