It's the SMSC queue which is full, not Kannel's. Talk to your SMSC provider and report the error, they're the only ones that can do something about it.
Regards, Alejandro On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > > > "SMSC returned error code 0x00000014 (Message Queue Full) in response to > submit_sm." > > > > Is there a way to delete these messages? or any parameter in the > kannel-config file which prevents the retry? > > > > Your help is appreciated. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Surya > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2008 10:01 PM > *To:* Surya > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 1 > > > > Surya, > > As the userguide clearly verses: > > "Optional the maximum number of outstanding (i.e. acknowledged) SMPP > operations between an ESME and SMSC. This number is not specified explicitly > in the SMPP Protocol Specification and will be governed by the SMPP > implementation on the SMSC. As a guideline it is recommended that no more > than 10 (default) SMPP messages are outstanding at any time." > > This means that kannel will open up to max-pending-submits messages without > waiting for a response. > > Regards, > > Alejandro > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks Alejandro, > > > What exactly does max-pending-submits? > Lets say, if max-pending-submits = 50, what will happen? > > Does it push 50 messages to the Bearerbox or > Does it push 50 messages to the SMSC > > After pushing how much time Does it wait for? And what will happen in that > time? > > Whats the role of throughput in this.. > > Sorry too many questions.. what to do perplexed mind try to understand. > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Surya > -----Original Message----- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:37:35 -0200 > From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: get mesage ID without DLR > To: Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Surya, > > [This is only relevant to SMPP links, other SMSC's may have different > behaviour] > > If the messages are already queued, there's not too much you can do about > it: default kannel's priority is 0 (maximum) so you won't be able to > prioritize anything. > > You can improve things a little in the future by setting the priority to a > higher number for regular messages (valid values are 0 to 4, being 0 the > highest priority and 4 the lowest). For example, you could set 2 as > default, > and then use 0 or 1 when you want to speed things. > > Regarding your throughput, that "10" figure is a limit imposed by the SMSC > I > suppose. If not, you could play with some tweaking of the "throughput" and > "max-pending-submits" parameters and see if you can get a better > performance. > > Regards, > > Alejandro > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Alejandro, > > > > > > > > Message_id for billing, I actually mean that after successful delivery of > > the message we can initiate the billing module?some kind of it. > > > > > > > > %F would be the new parameter for the message_id, I guess. Hope Alex > > Malyish completed his part. > > > > > > > > I have a big problem of the kannel queue, I can thousands of messages > are > > in the store file, > > > > Current throughput is 10. How do I set priority to the message to be > sent > > immediately. > > > > > > > > Can you share your experience on the kannel internal queue, as I just > went > > through this page. > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg10857.html > > > > > > > > I know its different from the priority optional parameter of the SMPP. > > > > > > > > And also how to the priority of the deliver_sm of the DLR message? Any > > idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Surya > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2008 11:18 PM > > > > *To:* Surya > > *Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR > > > > > > > > Surya, > > > > Yes, seems like everybody's using message_id for billing nowadays ;) > > > > Alex Malyish proposed a few tweaks that makes a lot of sens, will copy to > > you as well when those changes are made. > > > > Regards, > > > > Alejandro > > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Kudos!!! > > > > > > > > I believe you finally made it!! > > > > Many users face this problem of message id which is very critical for all > > the billing purpose.. > > > > Not only billing, we can also play with the messages, specially when > using > > SMPP.(Query, Cancel, Replace). > > > > > > > > Small request, I don't know the status of my subscription to devel list, > > can you send me the patch. > > > > If they are updating the patch immediately, I'll be the first one to use > > it. > > > > I have windows system which has internet, how to get the CVS check out, > I'm > > trying to get the Tortoise CVS tool. > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > Surya > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2008 9:53 PM > > > > > > *To:* Surya > > *Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR > > > > > > > > Surya, > > > > The patch was posted to devel a few hours ago, though it will still > suffer > > a few changes before being commited. > > > > Regards, > > > > Alejandro > > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > Sorry, I don't mind waiting a day? work pressure sometimes wants things > to > > happen right now. > > > > > > > > Which parameter replaced %w. > > > > > > > > I also subscribed to the devel list. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > Surya > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2008 12:22 AM > > *To:* Surya > > *Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR > > > > > > > > Surya, > > > > Will post the patch to the devel list when it's ready. To subscribe to > the > > list: http://www.kannel.org/lists.shtml > > > > The %w patch is a deprecated version of what I'm doing now. The new patch > > will be quite similar, though the sms structure will differ. If you can > wait > > one more day I'd recommend you to wait for the new patch to be available. > > > > Regards, > > > > Alex > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Can you forward the patch to me.. I'll try with %w > > > > > > > > I was going thorough this > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13407.html > > > > > > > > How to subscribe to the Devel List ? > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > Surya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081130/c212c028/attachme > nt-0001.html<http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081130/c212c028/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > End of users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 1 > ************************************ > > >
