This one is a keeper!
----- Original Message -----
From: Alejandro Guerrieri
To: Surya
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 1
It's the SMSC queue which is full, not Kannel's.
Talk to your SMSC provider and report the error, they're the only ones that
can do something about it.
Regards,
Alejandro
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the response.
"SMSC returned error code 0x00000014 (Message Queue Full) in response to
submit_sm."
Is there a way to delete these messages? or any parameter in the
kannel-config file which prevents the retry?
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Surya
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 10:01 PM
To: Surya
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 1
Surya,
As the userguide clearly verses:
"Optional the maximum number of outstanding (i.e. acknowledged) SMPP
operations between an ESME and SMSC. This number is not specified explicitly in
the SMPP Protocol Specification and will be governed by the SMPP implementation
on the SMSC. As a guideline it is recommended that no more than 10 (default)
SMPP messages are outstanding at any time."
This means that kannel will open up to max-pending-submits messages without
waiting for a response.
Regards,
Alejandro
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Alejandro,
What exactly does max-pending-submits?
Lets say, if max-pending-submits = 50, what will happen?
Does it push 50 messages to the Bearerbox or
Does it push 50 messages to the SMSC
After pushing how much time Does it wait for? And what will happen in that
time?
Whats the role of throughput in this..
Sorry too many questions.. what to do perplexed mind try to understand.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Surya
-----Original Message-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:37:35 -0200
From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: get mesage ID without DLR
To: Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Surya,
[This is only relevant to SMPP links, other SMSC's may have different
behaviour]
If the messages are already queued, there's not too much you can do about
it: default kannel's priority is 0 (maximum) so you won't be able to
prioritize anything.
You can improve things a little in the future by setting the priority to a
higher number for regular messages (valid values are 0 to 4, being 0 the
highest priority and 4 the lowest). For example, you could set 2 as default,
and then use 0 or 1 when you want to speed things.
Regarding your throughput, that "10" figure is a limit imposed by the SMSC I
suppose. If not, you could play with some tweaking of the "throughput" and
"max-pending-submits" parameters and see if you can get a better
performance.
Regards,
Alejandro
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alejandro,
>
>
>
> Message_id for billing, I actually mean that after successful delivery of
> the message we can initiate the billing module?some kind of it.
>
>
>
> %F would be the new parameter for the message_id, I guess. Hope Alex
> Malyish completed his part.
>
>
>
> I have a big problem of the kannel queue, I can thousands of messages are
> in the store file,
>
> Current throughput is 10. How do I set priority to the message to be sent
> immediately.
>
>
>
> Can you share your experience on the kannel internal queue, as I just went
> through this page.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg10857.html
>
>
>
> I know its different from the priority optional parameter of the SMPP.
>
>
>
> And also how to the priority of the deliver_sm of the DLR message? Any
> idea.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Surya
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2008 11:18 PM
>
> *To:* Surya
> *Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR
>
>
>
> Surya,
>
> Yes, seems like everybody's using message_id for billing nowadays ;)
>
> Alex Malyish proposed a few tweaks that makes a lot of sens, will copy to
> you as well when those changes are made.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alejandro
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kudos!!!
>
>
>
> I believe you finally made it!!
>
> Many users face this problem of message id which is very critical for all
> the billing purpose..
>
> Not only billing, we can also play with the messages, specially when using
> SMPP.(Query, Cancel, Replace).
>
>
>
> Small request, I don't know the status of my subscription to devel list,
> can you send me the patch.
>
> If they are updating the patch immediately, I'll be the first one to use
> it.
>
> I have windows system which has internet, how to get the CVS check out,
I'm
> trying to get the Tortoise CVS tool.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Surya
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2008 9:53 PM
>
>
> *To:* Surya
> *Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR
>
>
>
> Surya,
>
> The patch was posted to devel a few hours ago, though it will still suffer
> a few changes before being commited.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alejandro
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>
>
> Sorry, I don't mind waiting a day? work pressure sometimes wants things to
> happen right now.
>
>
>
> Which parameter replaced %w.
>
>
>
> I also subscribed to the devel list.
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Surya
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2008 12:22 AM
> *To:* Surya
> *Subject:* Re: get mesage ID without DLR
>
>
>
> Surya,
>
> Will post the patch to the devel list when it's ready. To subscribe to the
> list: http://www.kannel.org/lists.shtml
>
> The %w patch is a deprecated version of what I'm doing now. The new patch
> will be quite similar, though the sms structure will differ. If you can
wait
> one more day I'd recommend you to wait for the new patch to be available.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Surya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Can you forward the patch to me.. I'll try with %w
>
>
>
> I was going thorough this
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13407.html
>
>
>
> How to subscribe to the Devel List ?
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Surya
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081130/c212c028/attachme
nt-0001.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.kannel.org/mailman/listinfo/users
End of users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 1
************************************
